<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Michael Doan &#187; Business</title>
	<atom:link href="http://michaeldoan.com/category/business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://michaeldoan.com</link>
	<description>A personal website about all things that hold my interest.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 21:28:50 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Christopher Cox eats lunch</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/christopher-cox-eats-lunch/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/christopher-cox-eats-lunch/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 21:12:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christopher Cox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/?p=91</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I lunched with Christopher Cox (kinda).]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With all the posts I&#8217;ve been doing recently about the <a href="http://michaeldoan.com/tag/sec/">SEC</a>, it must have been fate that I shared the same dining room at lunch today with former SEC Chairman <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Christopher_Cox">Christopher Cox</a>. We were a couple of tables apart, but that&#8217;s the closest I ever want to be to anyone or anything related to the SEC.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Christopher+Cox+eats+lunch+http://bit.ly/bBb9Ep" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/christopher-cox-eats-lunch/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Tax &#8220;practitioner&#8221; uses fake tax theories to get refunds for clients</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/tax-practitioner-uses-fake-tax-theories-to-get-refunds-for-clients/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/tax-practitioner-uses-fake-tax-theories-to-get-refunds-for-clients/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:43:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tax]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tax preparer uses fake tax theories to get refunds for his clients.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lake Forest man uses <a href="http://www.ocregister.com/news/cao-258707-theory-tax.html">fake tax theories</a> to get tax refunds for his clients:</p>
<blockquote><p>Cao used a theory called &#8220;redemption&#8221; or &#8220;commercial redemption&#8221; &#8211; which prosecutors called a &#8220;rejected tax defier theory.&#8221; This theory claims that the U.S. Treasury keeps millions in a secret treasury account for each taxpayer. The secret account can be used to pay a taxpayer&#8217;s debts and tax liabilities if a taxpayer sends the IRS and banks certain documents, the theory goes.</p>
<p>&#8220;Cao&#8217;s theory is complete fiction,&#8221; the complaint reads.</p></blockquote>
<p>I am pretty sure that his clients didn&#8217;t pay too much for his valuable tax advice. You get what you pay for.</p>
<p>I once reviewed my parents&#8217; tax return which was prepared by some hack with an office and a computer with tax software installed. I&#8217;m not a tax CPA, but I&#8217;m pretty sure that it&#8217;s not a good idea to tell married couples to fraudulently file as &#8220;single&#8221;.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Tax+%E2%80%9Cpractitioner%E2%80%9D+uses+fake+tax+theories+to+get+refunds+for+clients+http://bit.ly/chvPyt" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/tax-practitioner-uses-fake-tax-theories-to-get-refunds-for-clients/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Accredited Investor&#8221; definition changes with Wall Street Reform Act</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/accredited-investor-definition-changes-with-wall-street-reform-act/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/accredited-investor-definition-changes-with-wall-street-reform-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 17:43:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/?p=88</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act changes the definition of "accredited investor".]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://www.corporatesecuritieslawblog.com/corporate-governance-legal-update-doddfrank-redefines-accredited-investor.html">Corporate &amp; Securities Law blog</a> has a great summary on how the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Proctection Act will affect the definition of &#8220;accredited investor&#8221;. The pertinent points are below:</p>
<ul>
<li>Net worth of $1 million excludes the value of the investor&#8217;s primary residence.</li>
<li>The SEC can revise the definition for the first four years following enactment of the act.</li>
<li>Within the next four years the definition of accredited investor must include an increase to the net worth threshold.</li>
<li>SEC is required to review the definition of net worth every four years.</li>
<li>the net worth amount will not be go below a $1 million floor.</li>
</ul>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=%E2%80%9CAccredited+Investor%E2%80%9D+definition+changes+with+Wall+Street+Reform+Act+http://bit.ly/97hHow" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/accredited-investor-definition-changes-with-wall-street-reform-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bond rating disclosure law: SEC grants six month deferral</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/bond-rating-disclosure-law-sec-grants-six-month-deferral/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/bond-rating-disclosure-law-sec-grants-six-month-deferral/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 11:19:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/?p=86</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The new financial reform law requires issuers of asset-back bonds to disclose their credit rankings. The SEC has granted a 6 month deferral for this requirement.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Now that the Dodd-Frank bill has been signed into law, issuers of asset-back bonds are required to disclose their credit rankings in their regulatory filings. Credit rating agencies like Moody&#8217;s are not happy about this because it subjects them to expert liability , &#8220;meaning that they would face the same legal risks as accountants and other parties that participate in bond sales.&#8221; Issuers were not able to obtain ratings for inclusion in their flings wit the SEC so the SEC granted issuers a waiver for six months which allows time for implementation of the law.</p>
<p>The <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_144A">article</a> briefly mentions that issuers will consider an alternatives to this a law by using Rule 144a but doesn&#8217;t adequately explain what 144a is. A good explanation of 144a is <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_144A">here</a>.</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Bond+rating+disclosure+law%3A+SEC+grants+six+month+deferral+http://bit.ly/aUPC7V" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/bond-rating-disclosure-law-sec-grants-six-month-deferral/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dell pays $100MM to SEC for lack of disclosure</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/dell-pays-100mm-to-sec-for-lack-of-disclosure/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/dell-pays-100mm-to-sec-for-lack-of-disclosure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jul 2010 04:33:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dell]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/?p=84</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dell's financial statement disclosures were lacking, settles with SEC for $100MM.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Financial statement disclosures in a public filing should allow an investor to see the company through the &#8220;eyes of management&#8221;. Dell&#8217;s management and the investors were <a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5jUCJAYwZVL1cpbFpAjhW4c6BMR3QD9H4F5RG0">seeing different things</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>SEC said [Dell] also failed to disclose to investors large payments it received from Intel Corp. in exchange for not using central processing units made by Intel&#8217;s main rival, Advanced Micro Devices Inc</p></blockquote>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Dell+pays+%24100MM+to+SEC+for+lack+of+disclosure+http://bit.ly/bbsKMM" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/dell-pays-100mm-to-sec-for-lack-of-disclosure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Proposed Accounting Standards Update may make it more difficult to get a bank loan</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/proposed-accounting-standards-update-may-make-it-more-difficult-to-get-a-bank-loan/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/proposed-accounting-standards-update-may-make-it-more-difficult-to-get-a-bank-loan/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jul 2010 01:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ASU]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FASB]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IFRS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ISAB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/?p=74</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In the current economic environment, its difficult to obtain a bank loan or a line of credit. Businesses fortunate enough to have a line of credit worry about having their line pulled as bank credit managers continually tighten their lending requirements to keep their reserve ratios up with regulatory demands. A recently proposed Accounting Standards [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In the current economic environment, its difficult to obtain a bank loan or a line of credit. Businesses fortunate enough to have a line of credit worry about having their line pulled as bank credit managers continually tighten their lending requirements to keep their reserve ratios up with regulatory demands.  A recently proposed Accounting Standards Update (ASU) <a href="http://www.fasb.org/cs/BlobServer?blobcol=urldata&#038;blobtable=MungoBlobs&#038;blobkey=id&#038;blobwhere=1175820873224&#038;blobheader=application%2Fpdf">No. 1810-100</a> (PDF) issued by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) could make it more difficult to obtain a bank loan.</p>
<p>ASU No. 1810-100, <em>Accounting for Financial Instruments and Revisions to the Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities &#8212; Financial Instruments (Topic 825) and Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815)</em> would, according to the FASB, result in common fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRS, including word changes to describe the principles and requirements.</p>
<p>The impairment test and expanded use of fair value measurements in the proposed ASU 1810-100 has caused a stir in the banking industry. Banks say that changes in the accounting standards will require them to beef up their reserves and scale back loan originations. If this happens, businesses may find it even more difficult to get a line of credit.</p>
<p>Comments on this proposed standard is due September 7, 2010</p>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Proposed+Accounting+Standards+Update+may+make+it+more+difficult+to+get+a+bank+loan+http://bit.ly/cAUqd9" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/proposed-accounting-standards-update-may-make-it-more-difficult-to-get-a-bank-loan/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Say-on-Pay Provision of Wall Street Reform Bill affects Company Reporting</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/say-on-pay-provision-of-wall-street-reform-bill-affects-company-reporting/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/say-on-pay-provision-of-wall-street-reform-bill-affects-company-reporting/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:39:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEC]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/say-on-pay-provision-of-wall-street-reform-bill-affects-company-reporting/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, will have an impact on public companies.  The bill, if passed, calls for shareholder votes (PDF) on executive compensation. The &#8220;say-on-pay&#8221; provision of the bill may alter the annual proxy process. The bill calls for hareholder votes on executive pay to take place within six months [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='posterous_autopost'>
<p>The <a href="http://financialservices.house.gov/Key_Issues/Financial_Regulatory_Reform/Financial_Regulatory_Reform062410.html">Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act</a>, will have an impact on public companies. </p>
<p>The bill, if passed, calls for <a href="http://financialservices.house.gov/Key_Issues/Financial_Regulatory_Reform/Final_conference_titles/T9_FINAL.pdf">shareholder votes</a> (PDF) on executive compensation. The &ldquo;say-on-pay&rdquo; provision of the bill may alter the annual proxy process. The bill calls for hareholder votes on executive pay to take place within six months of the bill&rsquo;s enactment. The SEC will have to act quickly to implement the bill.</p>
<p>A &ldquo;say-on-pay&rdquo; rule already applies to recipients of government aid under the Troubled Asset Relief Program. The current bill extends it to all public companies; however, it does allow the SEC to exempt an issuer or class of issuers. </p>
<p>The bill also require public companies to: </p>
<ul>
<li>hold shareholder votes every three years on executive compensation</li>
<li>consider increasing the frequency to annual or bi-annual votes every six years </li>
</ul>
<p>Shareholders may make proposals, independent of management, on executive compensation practices. These proposals may be off-cycle; that is, they don&rsquo;t have to fall within the three year and six year cycles noted above. </p>
<p>The bill also requires that compensation committee members be independent. </p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a>   from <a href="http://michaeldoan.posterous.com/say-on-pay-provision-of-wall-street-reform-bi">Michael Doan</a>  </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Say-on-Pay+Provision+of+Wall+Street+Reform+Bill+affects+Company+Reporting+http://bit.ly/b9IPuo" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/say-on-pay-provision-of-wall-street-reform-bill-affects-company-reporting/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Interesting PCAOB fact</title>
		<link>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/interesting-pcaob-fact/</link>
		<comments>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/interesting-pcaob-fact/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jul 2010 21:39:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Michael Doan</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Accounting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PCAOB]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/interesting-pcaob-fact/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Public Company Accounting Oversight Board is not formally a government agency. As such, they don&#8217;t have to adhere to government pay schedules. This means that board members are paid more that $500,000 per year. Not a bad job if you can get it. Posted via email from Michael Doan]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class='posterous_autopost'>
<p>The <a href="http://pcaobus.org/Pages/default.aspx">Public Company Accounting Oversight Board</a> is not formally a government agency. As such, they don&rsquo;t have to adhere to government pay schedules. This means that board members are paid more that $500,000 per year. Not a bad job if you can get it.</p>
<p style="font-size: 10px;">  <a href="http://posterous.com">Posted via email</a>   from <a href="http://michaeldoan.posterous.com/interesting-pcaob">Michael Doan</a>  </p>
</p></div>
<p align="left"><a class="tt" href="http://twitter.com/home/?status=Interesting+PCAOB+fact+http://bit.ly/9mfAEh" title="Post to Twitter"><img class="nothumb" src="http://michaeldoan.com/wp-content/plugins/tweet-this/icons/tt-twitter-micro3.png" alt="Post to Twitter" /></a></p>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://michaeldoan.com/2010/07/interesting-pcaob-fact/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
